Is Fed Independence at Risk of Presidential Influence?

We believe that there are several guardrails in place that considerably limit the extent of presidential influence over monetary policy decisions.

KEY POINTS

What it is

We analyze the extent of influence a U.S. president can exert over monetary policies.

Why it matters

Overt presidential interference in monetary policy would be highly controversial and could lead to significant market volatility.

Where it's going

We believe that there are guardrails in place that limit the extent of presidential influence over monetary policy.

Multiple times during his campaign, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump expressed his desire for more presidential say over monetary policy, and that the Fed should wait until after the election to cut interest rates. Of course, the Fed embarked on a rate cutting cycle in September, but now that a second Trump administration is imminent, investors may well wonder whether he may indeed push to have more influence on Fed policy.

A challenge to Fed independence would have significant consequences and could set a precedent for future administrations. However, we believe that there are several guardrails in place that could considerably limit the extent of presidential influence over monetary policy decisions.

First, Fed Chair Jay Powell’s term extends to May 2026 and Trump has stated he would let him serve out his term, though adding “especially if I thought he was doing the right thing”.1 In reality, the legal bar for removing a Fed chair is very high.2 And, when asked if he would resign if Trump asked him to during the press conference following the November 7 Fed meeting, Powell replied with a terse “no”. Second, the Fed’s monetary policymaking body — the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) — is about more than just the Fed chair. For instance, the terms of the other members of the Fed board are staggered, with terms of only one of the other six members’ terms (other than the chair) expiring during Trump’s second term. This number could increase, for instance, if the two vice chairs are not renominated for their roles and decide not to serve out their remaining board terms.

In addition, the FOMC is composed of more than just the Fed board members. Five of the 12 voting members of the FOMC are regional reserve bank presidents, chosen by their local boards of business leaders and not subject to presidential nomination nor Senate confirmation. And one of the reserve bank presidents (the head of the New York Fed) customarily serves as vice chair of the FOMC.

Should Trump nominate a more pliable chair in 2026, the Senate would still need to confirm that person. Trump’s track record in getting non-conventional Fed nominees confirmed by the Senate is not very good. His nomination of Judy Shelton to become a member of the Federal Reserve Board was blocked by the Senate, while other publicized potential nominees for Fed governor, such as Stephen Moore and Herman Cain, did not make it to the confirmation process. One could argue that Trump’s sway over the Senate will likely be stronger now than it was during his first term, but we should also keep in mind that, even within the context of a more agreeable Senate, the bar for Senate confirmation of a Fed chair is much higher than that for member of the board.

What does this mean?

Overt presidential interference in monetary policy would be highly controversial and could lead to significant market volatility. So while Trump could make an attempt at challenging Fed independence, causing what could turn out to be substantial financial market turmoil would run counter to Trump’s view of the stock market as a barometer of success. Trump could certainly continue to be a vocal critic of Fed action, similar to his first term. However, we believe the guardrails from the FOMC structure, and a reticence to add unnecessary market volatility, will limit his ability and willingness to directly interfere with the conduct of monetary policy.

₁Interview with Bloomberg Businessweek. June 25, 2024

₂There have been some contentious presidential and Fed chair relationships in the past. For example, President Ronald Reagan and former Fed Chair Paul Volcker came into conflict, as did President Harry Truman and former Fed Chair Thomas McCabe. While Volcker finished his term, McCabe resigned prior to the end of his term under pressure from the White House.

Meet Your Expert

Antulio N. Bomfim

Head of Global Macro – Global Fixed Income

Antulio Bomfim, head of global macro for the global fixed income team, oversees interest rate strategy, systematic volatility, liquidity and monitoring of systemic risk globally. He is also responsible for the firm’s global liquidity management business.

Read Bio

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

Northern Trust Asset Management (NTAM) is composed of Northern Trust Investments, Inc., Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, Northern Trust Global Investments Japan, K.K., NT Global Advisors, Inc., 50 South Capital Advisors, LLC, Northern Trust Asset Management Australia Pty Ltd, and investment personnel of The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited and The Northern Trust Company.

Issued in the United Kingdom by Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, issued in the European Economic Association (“EEA”) by Northern Trust Fund Managers (Ireland) Limited, issued in Australia by Northern Trust Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ACN 648 476 019) which holds an Australian Financial Services Licence (License Number: 529895) and is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and issued in Hong Kong by The Northern Trust Company of Hong Kong Limited which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission.

For Asia-Pacific (APAC) and Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) markets, this information is directed to institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not be relied upon by retail clients or investors. This document may not be edited, altered, revised, paraphrased, or otherwise modified without the prior written permission of NTAM. The information is not intended for distribution or use by any person in any jurisdiction where such distribution would be contrary to local law or regulation. NTAM may have positions in and may effect transactions in the markets, contracts and related investments different than described in this information. This information is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed, and is subject to change. Information does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy, is not intended as investment advice and does not take into account all the circumstances of each investor.

This report is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Recipients should not rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from their own professional legal or tax advisors. References to specific securities and their issuers are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended and should not be interpreted as recommendations to purchase or sell such securities. Indices and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions.

All securities investing and trading activities risk the loss of capital. Each portfolio is subject to substantial risks including market risks, strategy risks, advisor risk, and risks with respect to its investment in other structures. There can be no assurance that any portfolio investment objectives will be achieved, or that any investment will achieve profits or avoid incurring substantial losses. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Risk controls and models do not promise any level of performance or guarantee against loss of principal. Any discussion of risk management is intended to describe NTAM’s efforts to monitor and manage risk but does not imply low risk.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Performance returns and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate. Performance returns contained herein are subject to revision by NTAM. Comparative indices shown are provided as an indication of the performance of a particular segment of the capital markets and/or alternative strategies in general. Index performance returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in any index. Net performance returns are reduced by investment management fees and other expenses relating to the management of the account. Gross performance returns contained herein include reinvestment of dividends and other earnings, transaction costs, and all fees and expenses other than investment management fees, unless indicated otherwise. For U.S. NTI prospects or clients, please refer to Part 2a of the Form ADV or consult an NTI representative for additional information on fees.

Forward-looking statements and assumptions are NTAM’s current estimates or expectations of future events or future results based upon proprietary research and should not be construed as an estimate or promise of results that a portfolio may achieve. Actual results could differ materially from the results indicated by this information.

Not FDIC insured | May lose value | No bank guarantee