Skip to content
    1. Overview
    2. Alternative Managers
    3. Consultants
    4. Corporations
    5. Family Offices
    6. Financial Advisors
    7. Financial Institutions
    8. Individuals & Families
    9. Insurance Companies
    10. Investment Managers
    11. Nonprofits
    12. Pension Funds
    13. Sovereign Entities
  1. Contact Us
  2. Search
Weekly Economic Commentary | April 19, 2024

The Sovereign Debt Problem

Debt distress is rising fast, but restructuring is becoming more complex.

Download PDF

 

By Vaibhav Tandon

This week, delegates and policymakers from different parts of the world gathered for the International Monetary Fund (IMF) spring meetings in Washington to discuss the state of the global economy and lay out plans to strengthen it. 

During her curtain-raiser speech, the IMF director Kristalina Georgieva told the audience to “fasten your seatbelts.”  The reference suggested that the soft landing might not be so soft in certain parts of the world. Georgieva’s advice is especially relevant for nations sitting on a large pile of debt.

Debt sustainability and the Fund’s capacity/ability to support countries under strain were a topic of conversation this week.  Developing economies, in particular, are suffocating under high interest rates which are hindering their economic recoveries.  According to the IMF, nine countries are already in debt distress with another 25 nations at a high risk of joining them.

 


 

Some low-income economies are spending as much as 13% of their gross domestic product (GDP) on servicing debt, four times the fraction that interest contributes to U.S. government outlays.  Low-income economies are expected to pay over $185 billion in interest on combined external and domestic debt in 2024.  Defaults have been avoided at the cost of development goals: the United Nations estimates that over 3 billion people live in nations where administrations spend more on interest payments than on education or health.  The imbalance explains why progress in reducing poverty has not merely stalled in some places, but started to reverse.  Persistent economic underperformance can give rise to political instability, which makes it difficult for a country to attract capital of any kind.

Debt distress is rising fast, but restructuring is becoming more complex, leading to delays.

In addition to the burden of interest rates, countries under distress are also forced to comply with fiscal austerity, an important condition that the IMF attaches to most of its financial assistance.  With western economies and multilateral agencies failing to provide swift and coordinated relief, poorer nations have been increasingly looking for bailouts from private creditors. 

According to research by economists Lawrence Summers and N.K. Singh, the private sector reaped $68 billion more in interest and principal repayments than it loaned to developing economies in 2023.  Instead of providing comprehensive debt relief to struggling economies, the lenders of last resort collected $40 billion in repayments of non-concessional loans from these nations.

The sovereign debt restructuring process has become much more difficult, owing to the wide variety of creditors and much larger debt involved.  The Sri Lankan government is struggling to reach an agreement with its bondholders for restructuring of around $12 billion of debt.  It took Zambia three years after its default to agree to a debt restructuring with private bondholders.  The true extent of liabilities is often not wholly known to creditors or international institutions. 

The issue of emerging market debt distress has garnered attention for a long time, but solutions have proven elusive.  New rules announced by the IMF this week aim to speed debt restructuring by easing the requirement that nations reach a debt agreement with one or more of its bilateral creditors.

The size, scope and nature of 21st century fiscal problems have grown, but the resources of multilateral bodies like the IMF have not progressed at the same rate.  The Biden administration is proposing to inject $21 billion to shore up the Fund’s ability to deliver financial aid.  Considering the debt and case load, other members will have to chip in.  More and more governments are living on borrowed time.

Related Articles

Read Past Articles

Meet Our Team

  • Check
    Navigate to Carl R. Tannenbaum

    Carl R. Tannenbaum

    Chief Economist

  • Check
    Navigate to Ryan James Boyle

    Ryan James Boyle

    Chief U.S. Economist

  • Check
    Navigate to Vaibhav Tandon

    Vaibhav Tandon

    Chief International Economist

    Follow Carl Tannenbaum
    Discover the latest economic insights from our chief economist on social media.

    Subscribe to Publications on Economic Trends & Insights

    Gain insight into economic developments and our latest forecasts for the United States.


    Information is not intended to be and should not be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation with respect to any transaction and should not be treated as legal advice, investment advice or tax advice. Under no circumstances should you rely upon this information as a substitute for obtaining specific legal or tax advice from your own professional legal or tax advisors. Information is subject to change based on market or other conditions and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.

    © 2024 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability in the U.S. Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different markets and are offered in accordance with local regulation. For legal and regulatory information about individual market offices, visit northerntrust.com/terms-and-conditions.